| Can A Catholic Be Saved The Berean Call, April 1995: A Dave Hunt Newsletter |
| Gateway Baptist Church Independent Unaffiliated Separated Soul-Winning KJV "It Does Make A Difference What You Believe". |
Question--If a Roman Catholic believes whole heartedly in the Lord Jesus Christ and is committed to serving Him as his
Lord; and if he believes that the only way his sins can be forgiven is through Christ's death as atonement for those sins,
and the believer is repentance, how come he is not saved? Suppose a person has salvation by faith alone, does he lose that
salvation by believing in infant baptism? Does he lose his salvation by believing that communion is really the body and
blood of Christ? Does he lose his salvation if he believes in purgatory?
Answer--Any one who believes the gospel, which is "the power of God unto salvation to everyone that believeth" (Rom 1:
16), is saved, whether he be called Catholic, Baptist, etc If, however, a Roman Catholic "believes wholeheartedly in the
Lord Jesus Christ," as the question suggests, then he would find himself in great conflict with the doctrines and practices
of his Church. It is logically impossible for a Roman Catholic to truly believe the gospel that saves and at the same time to
believe the tenets of Catholicism.
Let me ask you how a person can believe that Christ's sacrifice on the cross for our sins is an accomplished fact of
history and that He is now at the Father's right hand in heaven in a resurrected, glorified body and at the same time believe
that He "exists bodily as a wafer on Catholic altars where He is perpetually suffering the agonies of the Cross and being
literally "immolated in the sacrifice of the Mass" (Vatican ll, Flannery, pp 102-103)? How can a person believe that Christ's
redemptive work on the cross is "Finished!" as He himself said (John 19:30) and at the same time believe that the Mass is a
Perpetuation of Christ’s sacrifice? How, can one "Perpetuate and make Present" any Past event? It is logically impossible.
One may rememt5er or memorialize a past event, but one cannot Perpetuate, it in the present. And why would that be
necessary inasmuch as Christ's death and resurrection fully accomplished Christ's purpose?
Let me ask you how any person can believe that Christ does not offer Himself repeatedly, as were the Old Testament
sacrifices (Heb 9:25;10:1-3), but that "once... hath be appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself,...Christ was
once offered to bear the sins of many" (9:26,28), "this man [Christ], after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever,
sat down on the right hand of God .... For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified .... there is
no more offering for sin" (10:12-18)-and at the same time believe that the Mass is a "propitiatory sacrifice", that takes
away sin and that in it "the same, Christ who offered himself once in a bloody manner on the altar of the cross is
contained and is offered in an unbloody manner"?(Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1367) How can one believe, as
Vatican II states, that through Catholic liturgy, "especially in the divine sacrifice of the Eucharist, the work of our
redemption is accomplished (i.e., is an ongoing process]" (Flannery, p.l)-and at the same time believe that the work of our
redemption was accomplished once for all by Christ on the cross, as so many scriptures clearly state? (Heb 9:12; Eph 1.
-7; Col 1:14, etc.) How can one believe that by simple faith in Christ one receives eternal life and the assurance of heaven
as a free gift of God's grace, as the gospel that saves declares and at the same time believe that God's grace and the merits
of Christ (plus the merits of Mary and the saints-who needs them if Christ is sufficient?!) are contained in a treasury
which the Roman Catholic Church possesses and from which she dispenses in installments bits and pieces of this grace
(Vatican ll, Flannery, p 66, etc.) for attending Mass, saying the rosary, penance, etc., etc.?
A Catholic can't believe in Christ alone but in Christ plus baptism and the sacraments and other helps given by the Church.
Paul cursed the Judaizers who taught that in addition to faith in Christ's finished work one also must keep the Jewish law.
That destroys the gospel. How, then, can one believe in the gospel of Christ plus baptism for salvation and the Mass as a
propitiatory sacrifice and the other "sacraments of the New Law" which Trent and Vatican 11 say are essential for
salvation, the necessity of the Church and its priesthood, the intercession of Mary, purgatory, indulgences, etc.? You must
believe one gospel or the other; you can't believe two contradictory gospels at the same time. Whoever believes in Christ
alone, is saved. Whoever believes in Christ plus anything else for salvation, is lost. He has rejected the gospel of Christ
which alone saves those who believe it (Rom 1:16). And, indeed, those who preach this "other gospel" come under Paul's
anathema. (Gal 1:6-8)
The Berean Call
PO Box 7019
Bend, OR 97708
Lord; and if he believes that the only way his sins can be forgiven is through Christ's death as atonement for those sins,
and the believer is repentance, how come he is not saved? Suppose a person has salvation by faith alone, does he lose that
salvation by believing in infant baptism? Does he lose his salvation by believing that communion is really the body and
blood of Christ? Does he lose his salvation if he believes in purgatory?
Answer--Any one who believes the gospel, which is "the power of God unto salvation to everyone that believeth" (Rom 1:
16), is saved, whether he be called Catholic, Baptist, etc If, however, a Roman Catholic "believes wholeheartedly in the
Lord Jesus Christ," as the question suggests, then he would find himself in great conflict with the doctrines and practices
of his Church. It is logically impossible for a Roman Catholic to truly believe the gospel that saves and at the same time to
believe the tenets of Catholicism.
Let me ask you how a person can believe that Christ's sacrifice on the cross for our sins is an accomplished fact of
history and that He is now at the Father's right hand in heaven in a resurrected, glorified body and at the same time believe
that He "exists bodily as a wafer on Catholic altars where He is perpetually suffering the agonies of the Cross and being
literally "immolated in the sacrifice of the Mass" (Vatican ll, Flannery, pp 102-103)? How can a person believe that Christ's
redemptive work on the cross is "Finished!" as He himself said (John 19:30) and at the same time believe that the Mass is a
Perpetuation of Christ’s sacrifice? How, can one "Perpetuate and make Present" any Past event? It is logically impossible.
One may rememt5er or memorialize a past event, but one cannot Perpetuate, it in the present. And why would that be
necessary inasmuch as Christ's death and resurrection fully accomplished Christ's purpose?
Let me ask you how any person can believe that Christ does not offer Himself repeatedly, as were the Old Testament
sacrifices (Heb 9:25;10:1-3), but that "once... hath be appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself,...Christ was
once offered to bear the sins of many" (9:26,28), "this man [Christ], after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever,
sat down on the right hand of God .... For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified .... there is
no more offering for sin" (10:12-18)-and at the same time believe that the Mass is a "propitiatory sacrifice", that takes
away sin and that in it "the same, Christ who offered himself once in a bloody manner on the altar of the cross is
contained and is offered in an unbloody manner"?(Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1367) How can one believe, as
Vatican II states, that through Catholic liturgy, "especially in the divine sacrifice of the Eucharist, the work of our
redemption is accomplished (i.e., is an ongoing process]" (Flannery, p.l)-and at the same time believe that the work of our
redemption was accomplished once for all by Christ on the cross, as so many scriptures clearly state? (Heb 9:12; Eph 1.
-7; Col 1:14, etc.) How can one believe that by simple faith in Christ one receives eternal life and the assurance of heaven
as a free gift of God's grace, as the gospel that saves declares and at the same time believe that God's grace and the merits
of Christ (plus the merits of Mary and the saints-who needs them if Christ is sufficient?!) are contained in a treasury
which the Roman Catholic Church possesses and from which she dispenses in installments bits and pieces of this grace
(Vatican ll, Flannery, p 66, etc.) for attending Mass, saying the rosary, penance, etc., etc.?
A Catholic can't believe in Christ alone but in Christ plus baptism and the sacraments and other helps given by the Church.
Paul cursed the Judaizers who taught that in addition to faith in Christ's finished work one also must keep the Jewish law.
That destroys the gospel. How, then, can one believe in the gospel of Christ plus baptism for salvation and the Mass as a
propitiatory sacrifice and the other "sacraments of the New Law" which Trent and Vatican 11 say are essential for
salvation, the necessity of the Church and its priesthood, the intercession of Mary, purgatory, indulgences, etc.? You must
believe one gospel or the other; you can't believe two contradictory gospels at the same time. Whoever believes in Christ
alone, is saved. Whoever believes in Christ plus anything else for salvation, is lost. He has rejected the gospel of Christ
which alone saves those who believe it (Rom 1:16). And, indeed, those who preach this "other gospel" come under Paul's
anathema. (Gal 1:6-8)
The Berean Call
PO Box 7019
Bend, OR 97708
| [Back to Home Page] Send us E-Mail Church Phone - (254) 865-6924 |
Website design by
Laura Slack
Copyright © 2007
Gateway Baptist
Church
All Rights Reserved
Laura Slack
Copyright © 2007
Gateway Baptist
Church
All Rights Reserved