| Gateway Baptist Church Independent Unaffiliated Separated Soul-Winning KJV "It Does Make A Difference What You Believe". |
For a Christian the promises of God are foundational to our very lives. It was faith in God's promises that brought us to
salvation. "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved." (Acts 16:31). It is faith in various divine promises
that gives us strength for daily living. A promise is "one's pledge to another to do or not to do something specified"
(Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary). God's promises, of course, are irrevocable and absolutely binding. Not so with
human promises. We may make promises with full intention of keeping them, but, for various reasons, find ourselves
unable to do so. Christians, however, should be vary cautious in making promises very hastily or lightly. Since God has set
the standard of veracity in keeping His promises, we, His children, should seek to keep ours.
THE ORIGIN OF PROMISES KEEPERS
Promise Keepers is a Christian organization for men. It was born in the heart of Bill McCartney, who at that time was the
head football coach for the University of Colorado. In 1990, McCartney, who built Colorado into a national football power,
began to discuss with friends his vision for some kind of an organization that would help to produce Christian men who
were stronger and more spiritual.
With this goal in mind, a convention was organized which met in Boulder Colorado, in 1991 with over 4000 men in
attendance. The next year it drew 22,000, and the next year 50,000. Needless to say, events of this magnitude have drawn
considerable attention not only from the religious press but also from the secular media. Rallies have now been expanded
beyond the Colorado area to other parts of the country. A national office has been established, and local chapters are being
organized.
THE PURPOSE OF PROMISE KEEPERS
Promise Keepers is limited to men. It exists for the express purpose of creating more vital male leadership in the Church. It
is broadly evangelical with a declared purpose to instruct men in biblical teaching to the end that they may be better
fathers, husbands, and church leaders. It is interdenominational in it's thrust.
It's mission statement contains the following declaration:
Promise Keepers is a Christ-centered ministry, dedicated to uniting men through vital relationships to become Godly
influences in their world...We believe God wants to use Promise Keepers as a spark in His hand to ignite a nation-wide
movement calling upon men from all denominational, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds to reconciliation, discipleship, and
godliness.
When one reads this statement, one is impressed at first glance. Here is a movement that wants to produce godly Christian
men. What could be wrong with that goal? Nothing in itself. The problem arises when the theological and methodological
premises of the movement are examined.
The intent is to bring together "men from all denominational backgrounds". Will this include Roman Catholics? Will it
include men who are members of churches within the National Council of Churches?
Men will be guided toward "reconciliation." What kind of reconciliation? Will they be able to fellowship and work together
despite important differences over biblical doctrine? Red lights begin to flash as one contemplates the implications of the
statement quoted.
THE STRENGTHS OF PROMISE KEEPERS
We are certainly in need of more spiritual men in this day of declension. Many churches lack spiritual men. Many find it
difficult to locate men in their membership who meet the spiritual qualifications of deacons or who can fill other spiritual
roles. The goal of seeking to increase the number of spiritual men in Christ's Church cannot in itself be faulted.
Furthermore, it cannot be denied that there is a need for men to take a more aggressive role in prayer, in the worship of
God, and in personal witness. Many Christian men are woefully lacking in Biblical knowledge and do not evidence much
desire for spiritual things. Promise Keepers aims to correct these deficiencies.
One of the most pressing needs in the Church today is for men to assume their rightful place of spiritual leadership in their
homes. As husbands they are supposed to lead their wives in the ways of God. As fathers, they are to raise their children
in the "nurture and admonition of the Lord". Sadly, however, many Christian men have little or no real spiritual leadership
in their family. Many men are consumed with their secular employment or with other pursuits and give little time to their
families. Promise Keepers is dedicated to challenging men to do a better job in the home.
There are seven promises which are accepted by a participant in the Promise Keepers program. They cover various parts
of one's life such as personal devotions, family life, church participation, and other matters. The idea of making solemn
covenants with God certainly has Biblical precedents and is not to be despised. Modern Christians shy away from getting
"tied down" and the concept of promises to God has merit. Despite all of these commendable goals, there are problems
with Promise Keepers that need to be more fully scrutinized.
THE WEAKNESS OF PROMISE KEEPERS
In the rush to express Christian Love, many have forgotten the necessity of Biblical discernment. While there are good
elements in many Christian organizations, the good must always be weighed against the bad. Our love is to abound "in
knowledge and in all judgment [discernment] " (Phil 1:9). In other words, we must be theologically discriminating in our
evaluation of men and movements. While we have mentioned some positive aspects of Promise Keepers, we must also call
attention to some very dangerous and un-biblical features as well.
An inadequate doctrinal statement. The statement of faith contains five points. They deal briefly with: the existence of
God, the nature of the Bible, the person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ, the person and work of the Holy Spirit, and
the facts of sin and salvation. The "Statement" is crafted in such a way that a broad spectrum of professing Christians
could agree to this. This is the reason so many men from a wide variety of theological and ecclesiastical backgrounds can
be involved together in the movement.
A Failure To Differentiate Between Biblical and Non-Biblical Churches. One of the seven promises of a Promise
Keeper is this: "A Promise Keeper is committed to support the mission of his Church by honoring and praying for his
pastor and by actively giving his time and resources." This sounds appealing and noble. Many questions, however, arise.
What is a Biblical Church? Are all churches biblical? Is a Catholic Church worthy of support? What about a church that
includes in "it's " mission the support of the National Council of Churches? Promise Keepers does not speak to these
vexing problems with any evidence of biblical discernment.
To encourage men to support their pastor and their church even though neither is following the word of God is to
compromise the truth. Christian men need to be told plainly and scripturally that they ought not to be members of nor
support a church that is not true to God's word.
The Use Of Speakers Representing A Wide Range Of Theological Viewpoints. Men who attend the rallies sponsored
by Promise Keepers are going to be exposed to a host of speakers who represent contradictory viewpoints. There will be
men such as Bill Bright, founder of Campus Crusade for Christ, a very ecumenical group. Bright was one of the signers of
the document, "Evangelicals and Catholics Together", an attempt to defend a closer tie with Roman Catholics. Jack
Hayford has been featured. He is pastor of the Church of the Way in Van Nuys, California, and a leading spokesman for
the modern charismatic movement. There is Charles Swindoll, president of Dallas Theological Seminary and a leader with
very broad concepts of fellowship.\
Among other speakers who have been featured are Bill Hybels, pastor of a "Super church" near Chicago; Luis Palau, a
very ecumenical evangelist; and Chuck Smith, another charismatic pastor from a California. To expose the men of Bible
believing churches to such a hodgepodge of speakers is to do them great spiritual disservice. We are to "speak the things
which become sound doctrine" (Tit 2:1). Many of these men (and others like them whom we have not mentioned) do not
teach sound doctrine.
An Unscriptural Ecumenical Emphasis. Promise Keepers is evolving into a major threat to sound, biblical, separated
local churches who are seeking to maintain a holy stand for God. The appeal of Promise Keepers is strong. It's promotion
by evangelical leaders is enticing. Men, even in fundamental local churches, know other men who have become involved,
are enthusiastic supporters of the program and encourage their friends to be part of it. Pastors who do not wish to "get on
the bandwagon" can face considerable opposition. The pressures are similar to those faced by pastors years ago when
Billy Graham began to move toward a more ecumenical position. Woe to the pastor who said anything against Billy
Graham! He could well lose his pulpit (and not a few did).
The "Reconciliation Statement" of Promise Keepers emphasizes that one of their goals is "getting together" by replacing
"personal prejudice" with "Biblical unity". Question: What constitutes "personal prejudice" in the realm of spiritual truth and
fellowship? Is the fact that some Christian men and their churches remain separated from other men and their churches
merely a matter of "personal prejudice", or is it a matter of biblical obedience?
Promise Keepers is definitely ecumenical. Promise #6 states: "A Promise Keeper is committed to reach beyond any racial
and denominational barriers to demonstrate the power of biblical unity." The phrase "denominational barriers" is a tricky
one. to many, denominations are simply man-made organizations who have long ago lost their relevance and should be
dismantled. Many liberal ecumenicists would hold such a view. However, what some evangelicals view as "denominational
barriers" are really theological barriers. For instance, when J. Gresham Machen left the Presbyterian Church years ago, he
founded another small denomination. But did he do so just out of spite and are the differences that separate the two groups
now inconsequential? No. There were deep theological issues at stake at that time and those issues are still present. Groups
like Promise Keepers tend to confuse "denominational barriers" with biblical and theological barriers. Biblical barriers were
created by God not men.
The principle was seen when a group of churches departed from the old Northern Baptist Convention and formed the
General Association of Regular Baptist Churches. "Denominational barriers" were "theological barriers". There are some
lines that cannot and ought not be erased. But Promise Keepers is moving apace to erase many of these barriers. If
member of a fundamental, separatist church can unite in worship and service with men who are content to belong to
churches that are part of the National Council Of Churches, an apostate body, then the position of biblical separation really
has little practical meaning. We are saying, in effect, that the position these men have taken, while it may not be personally
ours, is allowed within the bounds of true Christian Fellowship and that the associations that a man's church may have
should not be an impediment to cooperation and service. If this attitude catches hold in fundamental, separatist churches,
their historic position will be quickly undermined.
A Large Charismatic Presence. The modern Charismatic movement is active and pervasive. Charismatics believe that
the "sign gifts" , that most of the church until recent times accept as obsolete, are now active and essential in the life of the
Church. This includes the so-called gift of tongues which is perhaps the most prominent of the gifts emphasized.
Charismatics have a large influence with Promise Keepers.
Bill McCartney, of whom we spoke earlier, the generally- recognized founder of Promise Keepers, is himself a member of
a Vineyard Church. The Vineyard Movement sprang from the ministry of a pastor in California named John Wimber.
Vineyard churches emphasize the validity of "signs and wonders" today and view miraculous displays of divine power as
essential to the growth of the Church.
McCartney's pastor, James Ryle, a charismatic "signs and wonders" advocate, is a board member of Promise Keepers and
has claimed that God has given him a special revelation for the Body of Jesus Christ. Ryle is not alone. As mentioned
previously, many featured speakers are charismatics. Randy Phillips, the current president of Promise Keepers, is also
affiliated with the Vineyard movement (and , incidentally, spoke at Robert Schuller's International Men's Conference in
1994). Promise Keepers is well permeated with Charismatic influence.
Historically, fundamental, separatist churches have declined to become involved with charismatics. However, cooperation
with Promise Keepers will change this.
Unholy Music. "The men erupt in laughter as preacher Charles Swindoll, clad in faded denim, rides into the arena, atop a
Harley Davidson motorcycle, the savage lyrics and scratchy chords of "Born to be Wild" blaring in the background"
(Christianity Today, 2/6/95). In a meeting intended to produce men who are attempting to learn how control the natural
"wildness" of their sinful natures, one would hardly help from a secular rock song, "Born To Be Wild".
One national magazine described the scene at one of the Boulder conferences thus: "A Christian Rock band set the mood.
When the music stopped the crowd rose to do 'the wave' shouting 'Jesus, Jesus, Jesus...' 'We're scoring baskets for
Jesus,' declared emcee Bob Horner, an official with Campus Crusade for Christ" (Newsweek, 7/29/94, "The Gospel of
Guyhood")
Pastors who are trying to hold the line on music, guarding the flocks from the incursions of the modern rock beat, will not
be helped by Promise Keepers. Biblically, there is no such thing as "Christian Rock". The rock beat has it's roots in the
world and the lusts of the world, and cannot be sanctified for use in the temple of the Lord.
THE MAJOR FAILURE OF PROMISE KEEPERS
The Apostle Paul gave to us a great principle of holiness and a guideline for our conduct both personally and corporately.
"Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers...Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith
the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, and will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons
and my daughters, saith the Lord Almighty" (2 Cor 6:14, 17-18).
This is a divine promise based upon a divine command. It is a promise that the leaders of Promise Keepers have
forgotten. Exactly what does it say?
1. True believers are not to be yoked (associated in religious worship and service) with unbelievers. In uniting, particularly
with Roman Catholics in worship, Promise Keepers is violating this command. Many Roman Catholics are unbelievers in
the New Testament sense. They do not understand the true gospel nor are they resting by faith alone in the finished work
of Christ. Within our fundamental churches are many people who were formerly Roman Catholics and would testify to
this fact.
2. We are to remain separated in religious activity from what the passage calls "the unclean thing." Verses14-16 delineate
the "unclean thing". It is that which involves unrighteousness, spiritual darkness, Satanic power, unbelief, and idolatry. The
ancient city of Corinth, where the church addressed was located, was filled with false religion. Paul is warning Christians
that they are to remain separated from false religion. It is difficult for some present day Christians to realize that many
practitioners of false religion have smiling faces, cordial handshakes, caring ways, and, at least in part, biblical terminology.
Some contemporary Christians are apt to dismiss Paul's warnings as related only or mostly to situations in New Testament
times with little application for us today. The great scholar, Charles Hodge, however, had better perception than that. Hear
his comments on the Second Corinthians six passage.
We are to keep aloof from all intimate associations with evil, The exhortation is general, and it is not to be confined to
partaking of heathen sacrifices....And as we know that their special danger was from idolaters....it is to be presumed that
it was from all association with the heathen in their worship that the Apostle intended to warn them. But this is only one
application of the principle laid down, viz., that intimate associations ought not to be formed by the people of God with
those who are not His people...It is no doubt true that by unbelievers Paul meant the heathen. But it does not follow from
this that intimate association with the heathen is all the is forbidden. The principles apply to all the enemies of God and
children of darkness. (An Exposition of the Second Epistle to the Corinthians, pp. 165-66).
The yoke speaks of combined or cooperative religious activity. In commenting on the phrase, "Be ye not unequally yoked
together," Hodge comments: "It is the union of incongruous, uncongenial elements or persons that is forbidden (Hodge,
op. cit. p. 167).
God promises in this great passage to "receive" us, and to exercise His fatherly care toward us if we obey His command to
remain uncontaminated in our service and worship. Here is a great promise for all Promise Keepers to consider.
But should we refuse to fellowship with other believers on doctrinal grounds? Many feel that our doctrinal basis of
fellowship should be very minimal and that "Loving Jesus" is more important than doctrinal accuracy and agreement.
Randy Phillips, president of Promise Keepers was asked: "On the issue of Catholicism, does Promise Keepers have a policy
on how to interact with Roman Catholics?" Phillips responded: "What we do care about is do you love Jesus and are you
been born again by the Spirit of God? And so if you have been born again by the Spirit of God, then whatever the labels
are should not divide us. So from that standpoint all men are welcome...whether you're Baptist, Pentacostal, or Roman
Catholic. If you are in the Body of Christ, then you should be certainly welcome." (Media Spotlight," Promise Keepers,
Albert Dager, p.11).
The founder of Promise Keepers, Bill McCartney, echoed the same: "Promise Keepers doesn't care if you're Pentacostal.
Do you love Jesus....Hear me. Promise Keepers doesn't care if you're Catholic. Do you love Jesus...?" (94 Seize The
Moment Men's Conference, Portland, Oregon, June 18, 1994.)
Such statements as the above may give some the "warm fuzzies" but they are not in accord with Biblical teaching. God is
mightily concerned with truth, with correct doctrine and with the maintenance of the same. Many present-day Christians
may not be, but God is. Over and over in the New Testament we are admonished to maintain sound doctrine. We are to
"Hold fast the form of sound words" (2 Tim 1:13). Believers are to be "Nourished up in the words of faith and of good
doctrine"(1 Tim 4:8). We are to "Contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints" (Jude 3). Promise
Keepers is not obeying this scriptural emphasis.
There is far more to Christian fellowship than merely "loving Jesus". The "unity of the faith" (Eph 4:13) has an intellectual
and theological basis, not merely an emotional one. The Apostle John was very concerned that his spiritual children be
found "Walking in truth" (2 John 4). Fellowship with other Christians has certain Biblical limitations and guidelines. There
sometimes are doctrinal impediments to true fellowship. If a believer is in a church that is not true to God's word a church
that is, by it's teachings and associations, disobedient to truth, we ought not to be fellowshipping with them as though
there were nothing amiss.
"But", someone says, "some of the participants in Promise Keepers are true Christian bretheren." This no doubt is true, but
Paul gives us warning that there are some true Christian bretheren with whom we cannot fellowship in worship and
service: "But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or
covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat" (1 Cor 5:11). Among
other sins, the matter of idolatry is mentioned. In commenting on this passage, Fred Moritz is correct in noting that an
idolater was one who participated in false worship. "The separation from a disobedient brother in this instance is on
doctrinal as well as moral grounds." (Be ye Holy, The Call to Christian Separation, p. 76).
Men whose center of worship, for instance, is the Mass, are coming, each time they worship, to see the Lord Jesus Christ
offered again in a "unbloody sacrifice" upon the altar of their church. They participate in a church that believes that the
actual sacrifice for sins is repeated again and again. This heresy, until recent years, has been viewed as such by sound
Christians of almost all denominations. Now there is an air of tolerance abroad which is willing to view such a teaching as
an allowable option.
THE HARMFUL IMPACT OF PROMISE KEEPERS
Promise Keepers is as serious an attack upon biblical separatism and fundamentalism as the Church has seen since the rise
of Billy Graham and his ecumenical evangelism a generation ago. It is going to cause major problems for pastors who are
trying to maintain a biblical position.
This movement is promoting a disregard for the biblical teaching on ecclesiastical separation. This is a very difficult
teaching to protect anyway, because the tide of public opinion and even evangelical opinion is running strongly against
separatists. It is not fashionable to raise barriers and delineate theological truths sharply. When a major group like Promise
Keepers urges the Christian public to drop their "biases" and "prejudices" and rally together with all who call themselves
Christians, many within even fundamental churches are going to respond positively. Many think fundamentalists are too
contentious anyway and will welcome an opportunity to break away from what they feel are overly-narrow parameters. In
most of our separatist churches there are people who are members and even, in some cases, leaders, but who do not really
share the separatist convictions of the church. If the pastor does not promote Promise Keepers, such people are likely to
promote division in the church.
Fundamental churches that become active in the Promise Keepers movement will be exposing their men to teachings,
philosophies, and activities that are contrary to the historic position of their church. While some men could perhaps attend
rallies without being negatively influenced away from their church's teachings, they will be relatively few in number. "Evil
communications corrupt good manners" (1 Cor. 15:33), or, as someone has correctly rendered it, "Bad company corrupts
good character." If men of a fundamental local church associate on a regular basis in worship with Roman Catholics and
Charismatics, their spiritual character is going to be corrupted, their discernment will be impaired, and their stand for the
faith will be weakened. This in turn will cause the entire church to shift it's position, since men are the leaders of the
church. It will be gradual, but it will happen. Pastors should consider well such consequences before promoting the
program Promise Keepers.
As men participate in Promise Keepers, they will be attracted to leaders who are not sound in their theology and practice.
We have already mentioned a few of the speakers who are featured in Promise Keepers rallies. None of them are
fundamentalists. They represent a wide spectrum of theological teaching which would be contrary to the teaching of most
fundamental churches. It is already difficult for pastors of sound churches to protect their sheep from attractive and
articulate persons like this. They are featured in many public settings, author best-selling books, and appear on Christian
radio and television. A pastor does not need to give them further exposure to his people through Promise Keepers.
Participating in the programs of Promise Keepers opens the door for further and wider compromises. Once you begin to
ignore, or at least minimize, the importance of sound doctrine in favor of certain perceived benefits, it is easier to continue
doing this. Convictions begin to erode, and justification is made for all manner of unholy alliances.
To involve the men of a fundamental church with a group including many non-fundamentalists encourages a pragmatic
and "feeling oriented" basis of judgment rather than a scriptural one. We are living in a society that has largely replaced the
objective with the subjective. The important point for many is, "How do I feel about this?" If one "feels good", or "receives
a blessing", then the activity must be acceptable. To sing rousing songs with 30,000 men in a stadium is exhilarating to
many. They view it as an uplifting spiritual experience without stopping to consider the theological ramifications of it. This
is to put the judgments of men above the judgments of God. Our prayer and aim ought to be that of the psalmist: "Make
me go in the path of thy commandments, for therein do I delight" (Psalm 119:35). Our question should not be whether or
not we are having a "meaningful experience" but whether we are walking in the commandments of the Lord. Are the
premises of the Promise Keepers scriptural? This is the key question.
To worship and cooperate with Roman Catholics and others who are in doctrinal error promotes the idea that correct
doctrine is less important than fellowship. This is a very popular concept today in Christendom. One is reminded of the
slogan of an organization that was one of the forerunners of the World Council of Churches; "Doctrine divides, but service
unites." Many professing evangelicals today follow that philosophy, though they may not articulate it that way. But it is not
God's emphasis. Them early church continued "in the Apostle's doctrine and fellowship..." (Acts 2:42). Doctrine is more
important than fellowship and is listed first. Fellowship must be built on doctrine.
There is at least one more potential result from involvement with Promise Keepers that might be harmful. It removes the
center of Biblical instruction, at least in some matters, away from the local church. Where are men supposed to be
receiving their spiritual instruction? The answer is clear from Scripture--from their pastor within the context of their own
local church. However, the New Testament emphasizes the fact that the God-appointed pastor is to be the chief spiritual
tutor.
"And He gave some ... Pastors and teachers; for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying
of the body of Christ" (Eph 4:11-12). The leaders of the Promise Keepers are not the pastors of the men to whom they
minister. Whose responsibility is it to teach men about how to be fathers, husbands, and spiritual leaders? It is the
responsibility of the pastor. Now some may say, "But my pastor does not teach these things." Knowing something of the
ministry of hundreds of pastors across the country, my view of such a statement would be very negative. Observing,
however, over the years the reactions of church people to similar situations, I can speak perhaps with some helpfulness.
People will travel hundreds of miles and pay lots of money to sit and watch a noted leader put notes and diagrams on a
overhead screen and, with much flourish and charisma, tell them the very same things their pastor has been telling them
for many years. They will return to their homes, however, and tell their friends, "I never heard such teaching! I learned so
much!" The fact of the matter is, they heard little that their pastor had already told them many times. But to hear it in a
different, more exotic setting from someone who is supposed to be an 'expert' , somehow seemed to give it an authority
heretofore unknown.
Special problems can arise, however, when outside teachers, not part of the local church, give instruction which is
contrary to that given by the pastor. Bill McCartney, as an example, says it's perfectly all right to worship with Roman
Catholics, yet a man's pastor says it's not A conflict is immediately engaged, and to whom will the church member be
loyal?
CONCLUSION
What should Bible-believing pastors and local churches do about the problems created by Promise Keepers? Several steps
should be taken.
Inform your men of the dangers of the movement. We need not do it in a nasty spirit, but we need to do it. Many good
men are taken in by such movements as this, simply because they are not aware of the problems. It is the pastors task to
"guard the flock" as an overseer appointed by God )Acts 20:28). Guarding includes protecting the sheep from harmful
influences.
Refuse to promote Promise Keepers. There will be great pressure on some pastors to do just this, but the pastor must be
resolute. He should, of course, meet with any men who are concerned about the matter, and endeavor in a kind but biblical
way to show them why he cannot approve it.
Evaluate the ministry of your local church to men. Many churches may have inadequate ministry to men and may need to
recognize that weakness if it is present and make plans to correct it.
Examine your preaching and teaching. The pastor should examine his own preaching and teaching ministry. Is he
preaching the "whole counsel of God" which would include truth calculated to make the men of his church spiritually
stronger? Is he exposing his men to biblical truth that will make them better husbands, fathers, and church leaders?
Pastors are human and can sometimes fall into patterns of preaching that may be lacking in certain truths.
Stand firm as a church. The men of the church, particularly the leaders, should not allow a movement like this to take the
church off course from it's historic and biblical position. Good laymen within our local churches should stand with the
pastor and help other men see the dangers of becoming involved with Promise Keepers.
There needs to be much prayer, study of the Word of God, and a re-commitment to the doctrinal specifics of the local
church. We need to obey Ephesians 4:15-- " ... speaking the truth in love." When something is wrong, we need to say so
but in a manner that is characterized by genuine Christian Love.
"Wherefore take unto you the whole armor of God...stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth" (Eph 6:14).
"Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, quit ye like men, be strong" (1 Cor. 16:13).
This article may be ordered in booklet form from:
Baptist World Mission
PO Box 1463
Decatur, Alabama 35602
salvation. "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved." (Acts 16:31). It is faith in various divine promises
that gives us strength for daily living. A promise is "one's pledge to another to do or not to do something specified"
(Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary). God's promises, of course, are irrevocable and absolutely binding. Not so with
human promises. We may make promises with full intention of keeping them, but, for various reasons, find ourselves
unable to do so. Christians, however, should be vary cautious in making promises very hastily or lightly. Since God has set
the standard of veracity in keeping His promises, we, His children, should seek to keep ours.
THE ORIGIN OF PROMISES KEEPERS
Promise Keepers is a Christian organization for men. It was born in the heart of Bill McCartney, who at that time was the
head football coach for the University of Colorado. In 1990, McCartney, who built Colorado into a national football power,
began to discuss with friends his vision for some kind of an organization that would help to produce Christian men who
were stronger and more spiritual.
With this goal in mind, a convention was organized which met in Boulder Colorado, in 1991 with over 4000 men in
attendance. The next year it drew 22,000, and the next year 50,000. Needless to say, events of this magnitude have drawn
considerable attention not only from the religious press but also from the secular media. Rallies have now been expanded
beyond the Colorado area to other parts of the country. A national office has been established, and local chapters are being
organized.
THE PURPOSE OF PROMISE KEEPERS
Promise Keepers is limited to men. It exists for the express purpose of creating more vital male leadership in the Church. It
is broadly evangelical with a declared purpose to instruct men in biblical teaching to the end that they may be better
fathers, husbands, and church leaders. It is interdenominational in it's thrust.
It's mission statement contains the following declaration:
Promise Keepers is a Christ-centered ministry, dedicated to uniting men through vital relationships to become Godly
influences in their world...We believe God wants to use Promise Keepers as a spark in His hand to ignite a nation-wide
movement calling upon men from all denominational, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds to reconciliation, discipleship, and
godliness.
When one reads this statement, one is impressed at first glance. Here is a movement that wants to produce godly Christian
men. What could be wrong with that goal? Nothing in itself. The problem arises when the theological and methodological
premises of the movement are examined.
The intent is to bring together "men from all denominational backgrounds". Will this include Roman Catholics? Will it
include men who are members of churches within the National Council of Churches?
Men will be guided toward "reconciliation." What kind of reconciliation? Will they be able to fellowship and work together
despite important differences over biblical doctrine? Red lights begin to flash as one contemplates the implications of the
statement quoted.
THE STRENGTHS OF PROMISE KEEPERS
We are certainly in need of more spiritual men in this day of declension. Many churches lack spiritual men. Many find it
difficult to locate men in their membership who meet the spiritual qualifications of deacons or who can fill other spiritual
roles. The goal of seeking to increase the number of spiritual men in Christ's Church cannot in itself be faulted.
Furthermore, it cannot be denied that there is a need for men to take a more aggressive role in prayer, in the worship of
God, and in personal witness. Many Christian men are woefully lacking in Biblical knowledge and do not evidence much
desire for spiritual things. Promise Keepers aims to correct these deficiencies.
One of the most pressing needs in the Church today is for men to assume their rightful place of spiritual leadership in their
homes. As husbands they are supposed to lead their wives in the ways of God. As fathers, they are to raise their children
in the "nurture and admonition of the Lord". Sadly, however, many Christian men have little or no real spiritual leadership
in their family. Many men are consumed with their secular employment or with other pursuits and give little time to their
families. Promise Keepers is dedicated to challenging men to do a better job in the home.
There are seven promises which are accepted by a participant in the Promise Keepers program. They cover various parts
of one's life such as personal devotions, family life, church participation, and other matters. The idea of making solemn
covenants with God certainly has Biblical precedents and is not to be despised. Modern Christians shy away from getting
"tied down" and the concept of promises to God has merit. Despite all of these commendable goals, there are problems
with Promise Keepers that need to be more fully scrutinized.
THE WEAKNESS OF PROMISE KEEPERS
In the rush to express Christian Love, many have forgotten the necessity of Biblical discernment. While there are good
elements in many Christian organizations, the good must always be weighed against the bad. Our love is to abound "in
knowledge and in all judgment [discernment] " (Phil 1:9). In other words, we must be theologically discriminating in our
evaluation of men and movements. While we have mentioned some positive aspects of Promise Keepers, we must also call
attention to some very dangerous and un-biblical features as well.
An inadequate doctrinal statement. The statement of faith contains five points. They deal briefly with: the existence of
God, the nature of the Bible, the person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ, the person and work of the Holy Spirit, and
the facts of sin and salvation. The "Statement" is crafted in such a way that a broad spectrum of professing Christians
could agree to this. This is the reason so many men from a wide variety of theological and ecclesiastical backgrounds can
be involved together in the movement.
A Failure To Differentiate Between Biblical and Non-Biblical Churches. One of the seven promises of a Promise
Keeper is this: "A Promise Keeper is committed to support the mission of his Church by honoring and praying for his
pastor and by actively giving his time and resources." This sounds appealing and noble. Many questions, however, arise.
What is a Biblical Church? Are all churches biblical? Is a Catholic Church worthy of support? What about a church that
includes in "it's " mission the support of the National Council of Churches? Promise Keepers does not speak to these
vexing problems with any evidence of biblical discernment.
To encourage men to support their pastor and their church even though neither is following the word of God is to
compromise the truth. Christian men need to be told plainly and scripturally that they ought not to be members of nor
support a church that is not true to God's word.
The Use Of Speakers Representing A Wide Range Of Theological Viewpoints. Men who attend the rallies sponsored
by Promise Keepers are going to be exposed to a host of speakers who represent contradictory viewpoints. There will be
men such as Bill Bright, founder of Campus Crusade for Christ, a very ecumenical group. Bright was one of the signers of
the document, "Evangelicals and Catholics Together", an attempt to defend a closer tie with Roman Catholics. Jack
Hayford has been featured. He is pastor of the Church of the Way in Van Nuys, California, and a leading spokesman for
the modern charismatic movement. There is Charles Swindoll, president of Dallas Theological Seminary and a leader with
very broad concepts of fellowship.\
Among other speakers who have been featured are Bill Hybels, pastor of a "Super church" near Chicago; Luis Palau, a
very ecumenical evangelist; and Chuck Smith, another charismatic pastor from a California. To expose the men of Bible
believing churches to such a hodgepodge of speakers is to do them great spiritual disservice. We are to "speak the things
which become sound doctrine" (Tit 2:1). Many of these men (and others like them whom we have not mentioned) do not
teach sound doctrine.
An Unscriptural Ecumenical Emphasis. Promise Keepers is evolving into a major threat to sound, biblical, separated
local churches who are seeking to maintain a holy stand for God. The appeal of Promise Keepers is strong. It's promotion
by evangelical leaders is enticing. Men, even in fundamental local churches, know other men who have become involved,
are enthusiastic supporters of the program and encourage their friends to be part of it. Pastors who do not wish to "get on
the bandwagon" can face considerable opposition. The pressures are similar to those faced by pastors years ago when
Billy Graham began to move toward a more ecumenical position. Woe to the pastor who said anything against Billy
Graham! He could well lose his pulpit (and not a few did).
The "Reconciliation Statement" of Promise Keepers emphasizes that one of their goals is "getting together" by replacing
"personal prejudice" with "Biblical unity". Question: What constitutes "personal prejudice" in the realm of spiritual truth and
fellowship? Is the fact that some Christian men and their churches remain separated from other men and their churches
merely a matter of "personal prejudice", or is it a matter of biblical obedience?
Promise Keepers is definitely ecumenical. Promise #6 states: "A Promise Keeper is committed to reach beyond any racial
and denominational barriers to demonstrate the power of biblical unity." The phrase "denominational barriers" is a tricky
one. to many, denominations are simply man-made organizations who have long ago lost their relevance and should be
dismantled. Many liberal ecumenicists would hold such a view. However, what some evangelicals view as "denominational
barriers" are really theological barriers. For instance, when J. Gresham Machen left the Presbyterian Church years ago, he
founded another small denomination. But did he do so just out of spite and are the differences that separate the two groups
now inconsequential? No. There were deep theological issues at stake at that time and those issues are still present. Groups
like Promise Keepers tend to confuse "denominational barriers" with biblical and theological barriers. Biblical barriers were
created by God not men.
The principle was seen when a group of churches departed from the old Northern Baptist Convention and formed the
General Association of Regular Baptist Churches. "Denominational barriers" were "theological barriers". There are some
lines that cannot and ought not be erased. But Promise Keepers is moving apace to erase many of these barriers. If
member of a fundamental, separatist church can unite in worship and service with men who are content to belong to
churches that are part of the National Council Of Churches, an apostate body, then the position of biblical separation really
has little practical meaning. We are saying, in effect, that the position these men have taken, while it may not be personally
ours, is allowed within the bounds of true Christian Fellowship and that the associations that a man's church may have
should not be an impediment to cooperation and service. If this attitude catches hold in fundamental, separatist churches,
their historic position will be quickly undermined.
A Large Charismatic Presence. The modern Charismatic movement is active and pervasive. Charismatics believe that
the "sign gifts" , that most of the church until recent times accept as obsolete, are now active and essential in the life of the
Church. This includes the so-called gift of tongues which is perhaps the most prominent of the gifts emphasized.
Charismatics have a large influence with Promise Keepers.
Bill McCartney, of whom we spoke earlier, the generally- recognized founder of Promise Keepers, is himself a member of
a Vineyard Church. The Vineyard Movement sprang from the ministry of a pastor in California named John Wimber.
Vineyard churches emphasize the validity of "signs and wonders" today and view miraculous displays of divine power as
essential to the growth of the Church.
McCartney's pastor, James Ryle, a charismatic "signs and wonders" advocate, is a board member of Promise Keepers and
has claimed that God has given him a special revelation for the Body of Jesus Christ. Ryle is not alone. As mentioned
previously, many featured speakers are charismatics. Randy Phillips, the current president of Promise Keepers, is also
affiliated with the Vineyard movement (and , incidentally, spoke at Robert Schuller's International Men's Conference in
1994). Promise Keepers is well permeated with Charismatic influence.
Historically, fundamental, separatist churches have declined to become involved with charismatics. However, cooperation
with Promise Keepers will change this.
Unholy Music. "The men erupt in laughter as preacher Charles Swindoll, clad in faded denim, rides into the arena, atop a
Harley Davidson motorcycle, the savage lyrics and scratchy chords of "Born to be Wild" blaring in the background"
(Christianity Today, 2/6/95). In a meeting intended to produce men who are attempting to learn how control the natural
"wildness" of their sinful natures, one would hardly help from a secular rock song, "Born To Be Wild".
One national magazine described the scene at one of the Boulder conferences thus: "A Christian Rock band set the mood.
When the music stopped the crowd rose to do 'the wave' shouting 'Jesus, Jesus, Jesus...' 'We're scoring baskets for
Jesus,' declared emcee Bob Horner, an official with Campus Crusade for Christ" (Newsweek, 7/29/94, "The Gospel of
Guyhood")
Pastors who are trying to hold the line on music, guarding the flocks from the incursions of the modern rock beat, will not
be helped by Promise Keepers. Biblically, there is no such thing as "Christian Rock". The rock beat has it's roots in the
world and the lusts of the world, and cannot be sanctified for use in the temple of the Lord.
THE MAJOR FAILURE OF PROMISE KEEPERS
The Apostle Paul gave to us a great principle of holiness and a guideline for our conduct both personally and corporately.
"Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers...Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith
the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, and will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons
and my daughters, saith the Lord Almighty" (2 Cor 6:14, 17-18).
This is a divine promise based upon a divine command. It is a promise that the leaders of Promise Keepers have
forgotten. Exactly what does it say?
1. True believers are not to be yoked (associated in religious worship and service) with unbelievers. In uniting, particularly
with Roman Catholics in worship, Promise Keepers is violating this command. Many Roman Catholics are unbelievers in
the New Testament sense. They do not understand the true gospel nor are they resting by faith alone in the finished work
of Christ. Within our fundamental churches are many people who were formerly Roman Catholics and would testify to
this fact.
2. We are to remain separated in religious activity from what the passage calls "the unclean thing." Verses14-16 delineate
the "unclean thing". It is that which involves unrighteousness, spiritual darkness, Satanic power, unbelief, and idolatry. The
ancient city of Corinth, where the church addressed was located, was filled with false religion. Paul is warning Christians
that they are to remain separated from false religion. It is difficult for some present day Christians to realize that many
practitioners of false religion have smiling faces, cordial handshakes, caring ways, and, at least in part, biblical terminology.
Some contemporary Christians are apt to dismiss Paul's warnings as related only or mostly to situations in New Testament
times with little application for us today. The great scholar, Charles Hodge, however, had better perception than that. Hear
his comments on the Second Corinthians six passage.
We are to keep aloof from all intimate associations with evil, The exhortation is general, and it is not to be confined to
partaking of heathen sacrifices....And as we know that their special danger was from idolaters....it is to be presumed that
it was from all association with the heathen in their worship that the Apostle intended to warn them. But this is only one
application of the principle laid down, viz., that intimate associations ought not to be formed by the people of God with
those who are not His people...It is no doubt true that by unbelievers Paul meant the heathen. But it does not follow from
this that intimate association with the heathen is all the is forbidden. The principles apply to all the enemies of God and
children of darkness. (An Exposition of the Second Epistle to the Corinthians, pp. 165-66).
The yoke speaks of combined or cooperative religious activity. In commenting on the phrase, "Be ye not unequally yoked
together," Hodge comments: "It is the union of incongruous, uncongenial elements or persons that is forbidden (Hodge,
op. cit. p. 167).
God promises in this great passage to "receive" us, and to exercise His fatherly care toward us if we obey His command to
remain uncontaminated in our service and worship. Here is a great promise for all Promise Keepers to consider.
But should we refuse to fellowship with other believers on doctrinal grounds? Many feel that our doctrinal basis of
fellowship should be very minimal and that "Loving Jesus" is more important than doctrinal accuracy and agreement.
Randy Phillips, president of Promise Keepers was asked: "On the issue of Catholicism, does Promise Keepers have a policy
on how to interact with Roman Catholics?" Phillips responded: "What we do care about is do you love Jesus and are you
been born again by the Spirit of God? And so if you have been born again by the Spirit of God, then whatever the labels
are should not divide us. So from that standpoint all men are welcome...whether you're Baptist, Pentacostal, or Roman
Catholic. If you are in the Body of Christ, then you should be certainly welcome." (Media Spotlight," Promise Keepers,
Albert Dager, p.11).
The founder of Promise Keepers, Bill McCartney, echoed the same: "Promise Keepers doesn't care if you're Pentacostal.
Do you love Jesus....Hear me. Promise Keepers doesn't care if you're Catholic. Do you love Jesus...?" (94 Seize The
Moment Men's Conference, Portland, Oregon, June 18, 1994.)
Such statements as the above may give some the "warm fuzzies" but they are not in accord with Biblical teaching. God is
mightily concerned with truth, with correct doctrine and with the maintenance of the same. Many present-day Christians
may not be, but God is. Over and over in the New Testament we are admonished to maintain sound doctrine. We are to
"Hold fast the form of sound words" (2 Tim 1:13). Believers are to be "Nourished up in the words of faith and of good
doctrine"(1 Tim 4:8). We are to "Contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints" (Jude 3). Promise
Keepers is not obeying this scriptural emphasis.
There is far more to Christian fellowship than merely "loving Jesus". The "unity of the faith" (Eph 4:13) has an intellectual
and theological basis, not merely an emotional one. The Apostle John was very concerned that his spiritual children be
found "Walking in truth" (2 John 4). Fellowship with other Christians has certain Biblical limitations and guidelines. There
sometimes are doctrinal impediments to true fellowship. If a believer is in a church that is not true to God's word a church
that is, by it's teachings and associations, disobedient to truth, we ought not to be fellowshipping with them as though
there were nothing amiss.
"But", someone says, "some of the participants in Promise Keepers are true Christian bretheren." This no doubt is true, but
Paul gives us warning that there are some true Christian bretheren with whom we cannot fellowship in worship and
service: "But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or
covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat" (1 Cor 5:11). Among
other sins, the matter of idolatry is mentioned. In commenting on this passage, Fred Moritz is correct in noting that an
idolater was one who participated in false worship. "The separation from a disobedient brother in this instance is on
doctrinal as well as moral grounds." (Be ye Holy, The Call to Christian Separation, p. 76).
Men whose center of worship, for instance, is the Mass, are coming, each time they worship, to see the Lord Jesus Christ
offered again in a "unbloody sacrifice" upon the altar of their church. They participate in a church that believes that the
actual sacrifice for sins is repeated again and again. This heresy, until recent years, has been viewed as such by sound
Christians of almost all denominations. Now there is an air of tolerance abroad which is willing to view such a teaching as
an allowable option.
THE HARMFUL IMPACT OF PROMISE KEEPERS
Promise Keepers is as serious an attack upon biblical separatism and fundamentalism as the Church has seen since the rise
of Billy Graham and his ecumenical evangelism a generation ago. It is going to cause major problems for pastors who are
trying to maintain a biblical position.
This movement is promoting a disregard for the biblical teaching on ecclesiastical separation. This is a very difficult
teaching to protect anyway, because the tide of public opinion and even evangelical opinion is running strongly against
separatists. It is not fashionable to raise barriers and delineate theological truths sharply. When a major group like Promise
Keepers urges the Christian public to drop their "biases" and "prejudices" and rally together with all who call themselves
Christians, many within even fundamental churches are going to respond positively. Many think fundamentalists are too
contentious anyway and will welcome an opportunity to break away from what they feel are overly-narrow parameters. In
most of our separatist churches there are people who are members and even, in some cases, leaders, but who do not really
share the separatist convictions of the church. If the pastor does not promote Promise Keepers, such people are likely to
promote division in the church.
Fundamental churches that become active in the Promise Keepers movement will be exposing their men to teachings,
philosophies, and activities that are contrary to the historic position of their church. While some men could perhaps attend
rallies without being negatively influenced away from their church's teachings, they will be relatively few in number. "Evil
communications corrupt good manners" (1 Cor. 15:33), or, as someone has correctly rendered it, "Bad company corrupts
good character." If men of a fundamental local church associate on a regular basis in worship with Roman Catholics and
Charismatics, their spiritual character is going to be corrupted, their discernment will be impaired, and their stand for the
faith will be weakened. This in turn will cause the entire church to shift it's position, since men are the leaders of the
church. It will be gradual, but it will happen. Pastors should consider well such consequences before promoting the
program Promise Keepers.
As men participate in Promise Keepers, they will be attracted to leaders who are not sound in their theology and practice.
We have already mentioned a few of the speakers who are featured in Promise Keepers rallies. None of them are
fundamentalists. They represent a wide spectrum of theological teaching which would be contrary to the teaching of most
fundamental churches. It is already difficult for pastors of sound churches to protect their sheep from attractive and
articulate persons like this. They are featured in many public settings, author best-selling books, and appear on Christian
radio and television. A pastor does not need to give them further exposure to his people through Promise Keepers.
Participating in the programs of Promise Keepers opens the door for further and wider compromises. Once you begin to
ignore, or at least minimize, the importance of sound doctrine in favor of certain perceived benefits, it is easier to continue
doing this. Convictions begin to erode, and justification is made for all manner of unholy alliances.
To involve the men of a fundamental church with a group including many non-fundamentalists encourages a pragmatic
and "feeling oriented" basis of judgment rather than a scriptural one. We are living in a society that has largely replaced the
objective with the subjective. The important point for many is, "How do I feel about this?" If one "feels good", or "receives
a blessing", then the activity must be acceptable. To sing rousing songs with 30,000 men in a stadium is exhilarating to
many. They view it as an uplifting spiritual experience without stopping to consider the theological ramifications of it. This
is to put the judgments of men above the judgments of God. Our prayer and aim ought to be that of the psalmist: "Make
me go in the path of thy commandments, for therein do I delight" (Psalm 119:35). Our question should not be whether or
not we are having a "meaningful experience" but whether we are walking in the commandments of the Lord. Are the
premises of the Promise Keepers scriptural? This is the key question.
To worship and cooperate with Roman Catholics and others who are in doctrinal error promotes the idea that correct
doctrine is less important than fellowship. This is a very popular concept today in Christendom. One is reminded of the
slogan of an organization that was one of the forerunners of the World Council of Churches; "Doctrine divides, but service
unites." Many professing evangelicals today follow that philosophy, though they may not articulate it that way. But it is not
God's emphasis. Them early church continued "in the Apostle's doctrine and fellowship..." (Acts 2:42). Doctrine is more
important than fellowship and is listed first. Fellowship must be built on doctrine.
There is at least one more potential result from involvement with Promise Keepers that might be harmful. It removes the
center of Biblical instruction, at least in some matters, away from the local church. Where are men supposed to be
receiving their spiritual instruction? The answer is clear from Scripture--from their pastor within the context of their own
local church. However, the New Testament emphasizes the fact that the God-appointed pastor is to be the chief spiritual
tutor.
"And He gave some ... Pastors and teachers; for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying
of the body of Christ" (Eph 4:11-12). The leaders of the Promise Keepers are not the pastors of the men to whom they
minister. Whose responsibility is it to teach men about how to be fathers, husbands, and spiritual leaders? It is the
responsibility of the pastor. Now some may say, "But my pastor does not teach these things." Knowing something of the
ministry of hundreds of pastors across the country, my view of such a statement would be very negative. Observing,
however, over the years the reactions of church people to similar situations, I can speak perhaps with some helpfulness.
People will travel hundreds of miles and pay lots of money to sit and watch a noted leader put notes and diagrams on a
overhead screen and, with much flourish and charisma, tell them the very same things their pastor has been telling them
for many years. They will return to their homes, however, and tell their friends, "I never heard such teaching! I learned so
much!" The fact of the matter is, they heard little that their pastor had already told them many times. But to hear it in a
different, more exotic setting from someone who is supposed to be an 'expert' , somehow seemed to give it an authority
heretofore unknown.
Special problems can arise, however, when outside teachers, not part of the local church, give instruction which is
contrary to that given by the pastor. Bill McCartney, as an example, says it's perfectly all right to worship with Roman
Catholics, yet a man's pastor says it's not A conflict is immediately engaged, and to whom will the church member be
loyal?
CONCLUSION
What should Bible-believing pastors and local churches do about the problems created by Promise Keepers? Several steps
should be taken.
Inform your men of the dangers of the movement. We need not do it in a nasty spirit, but we need to do it. Many good
men are taken in by such movements as this, simply because they are not aware of the problems. It is the pastors task to
"guard the flock" as an overseer appointed by God )Acts 20:28). Guarding includes protecting the sheep from harmful
influences.
Refuse to promote Promise Keepers. There will be great pressure on some pastors to do just this, but the pastor must be
resolute. He should, of course, meet with any men who are concerned about the matter, and endeavor in a kind but biblical
way to show them why he cannot approve it.
Evaluate the ministry of your local church to men. Many churches may have inadequate ministry to men and may need to
recognize that weakness if it is present and make plans to correct it.
Examine your preaching and teaching. The pastor should examine his own preaching and teaching ministry. Is he
preaching the "whole counsel of God" which would include truth calculated to make the men of his church spiritually
stronger? Is he exposing his men to biblical truth that will make them better husbands, fathers, and church leaders?
Pastors are human and can sometimes fall into patterns of preaching that may be lacking in certain truths.
Stand firm as a church. The men of the church, particularly the leaders, should not allow a movement like this to take the
church off course from it's historic and biblical position. Good laymen within our local churches should stand with the
pastor and help other men see the dangers of becoming involved with Promise Keepers.
There needs to be much prayer, study of the Word of God, and a re-commitment to the doctrinal specifics of the local
church. We need to obey Ephesians 4:15-- " ... speaking the truth in love." When something is wrong, we need to say so
but in a manner that is characterized by genuine Christian Love.
"Wherefore take unto you the whole armor of God...stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth" (Eph 6:14).
"Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, quit ye like men, be strong" (1 Cor. 16:13).
This article may be ordered in booklet form from:
Baptist World Mission
PO Box 1463
Decatur, Alabama 35602
| [Back to Home Page] Send us E-Mail Church Phone - (254) 865-6924 |
Website design by
Laura Slack
Copyright © 2007
Gateway Baptist
Church
All Rights Reserved
Laura Slack
Copyright © 2007
Gateway Baptist
Church
All Rights Reserved
| PROMISE KEEPERS AND THE FORGOTTEN PROMISE Ernest D. Pickering |